The New York TimesThe New York Times OpinionJune 13, 2002  

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
- Columns
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Text Version

Discover New Topics in Depth


Go to Advanced Search/Archive Go to Advanced Search/Archive Symbol Lookup
Search Optionsdivide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, jimbopclyons

Step Lively? Tell It to My Crosstown Bus!

To the Editor:

Re "A New York Question: Shall We Walk, or Do We Have Time to Take a Bus?" (news article, June 10):

My commuter bus leaves me at the Port Authority Bus Terminal. I can either hop on the M-42 crosstown bus to my office on Third Avenue, or walk. While my walking pace is about four miles an hour, the bus usually passes me at Fifth Avenue.

Mere speed is not my reason for walking. Health is. I've lost weight (40 pounds since January) simply by skipping the bus and hoofing it.

Plus, I save $60 a month walking both ways. For distances under one mile, walking wins every time!

JAMES LYONS
East Stroudsburg, Pa., June 10, 2002

To the Editor:

Re "A New York Question: Shall We Walk, or Do We Have Time to Take a Bus?" (news article, June 10):

There is an easy, no-cost method of increasing the speed of buses by a factor that I, as a frequent passenger on New York City buses for more than 65 years, estimate at 50 to 100 percent.

On every route that I take in Manhattan, those waiting to board must wait while passengers exit at the front. Strictly enforcing an exit-at-the-rear rule would cut boarding time in half.

Merely having the driver announce this rule would encourage passengers to observe this procedure.

STEPHEN R. LANGENTHAL
New York, June 10, 2002

• 

To the Editor:

As a regular rider of the Q-46 bus along Union Turnpike, I can say with certainty that dedicated bus lanes or fewer bus stops would do nothing to increase the speed of transit (news article, June 10).

The main culprit? Obtuse bus drivers taking their sweet time.

I've been on the bus countless times fuming as a driver pokes down the avenue, stopping repeatedly at green lights. Green lights. If any riders have the temerity to protest that they might need to actually get to their destinations, they are often shouted down by the driver. The excuse given is that the drivers need to maintain the "schedule," though their arrival time at the stops rarely corresponds to the times listed on that schedule.

Call me crazy, but I was always under the impression that the name of the game was "catching" the bus or the train, not waiting for it to sigh slowly into its destination.

DANIEL KLEINER
Hollis Hills, Queens, June 10, 2002





E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper.
Click Here for 50% off.


Home | Back to Opinion | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles

Recent Articles

A New York Question: Shall We Walk, or Do We Have Time to Take a Bus? (June 10, 2002)




Topics

 Alerts
New York City
Transit Systems
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters